Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Paley’s Chapter IX: Introduction, 11 Allegations (Badley)

1. In allegation I Paley defines the historical books of the New Testament to mean:
A) Writings of the early Church fathers.
B) The four Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles.
C) The four Gospels.
D) The Acts of the Apostles.
E) None of the above.

2. The Latin phrase found in allegation II, sui generis, means:
A) “One of a kind”.
B) “Generous nature”.
C) “Provable books”.
D) “Spiritual words”.
E) None of the above.

3. “To leave the argument without proofs, is to leave it without effect; for the persuasion produced by this species of evidence depends upon a view and induction of the particulars which compose it” (Paley, PDF 149; PP 132). This quote captures part of the strength of Paley's argument. With this in mind, how are the arguments of Paley different than that of Hume and Spinoza? What role does Paley's allegation VI play is this difference?

No comments: